Tag Archives: Parliament reform

Committee


Long ago I delt with this issue and came up with 18 Common’s committees each having 20 seats for 360 committee assignments in total. They are awarded in proportion to each Party’s seats in the House of Commons with Independents treated as a bloc like a Party.

Seats is the number of seats held in the House of Commons.

Comm assg is the number of committee assignments out of (Seats/343) X 360.

Drop is drop the decimal remainder.

Adj is awarding one extra assignment in order of highest decimal remainder till you get the 360 total committee seats.

Total is the total number of committee seats a Party is assigned.

Seats/Comm is the number of seats they have on every committee.

Extra is the seats left over which is 36 assignments or 2 seats per committee.

The extra seats are chosen by the House Leaders in order of largest to smallest so, Liberal, Conservative, Bloc, NDP, and then Mrs. Elizabeth May.

The first round each House Leader chooses 1 committee seat for their Party then Mrs. May chooses hers. This process goes round after round until all 360 committee seats have been assigned.

Independents are treated as a Party for the determination of the number of committee assignments but are chosen by the Independent MPs in order of seniority. Each round when the Independents choose, the most senior MP who hasn’t chosen a committee assignment selects one that’s open.

All MPs get to sit on at least 1 committee with some getting 2 assignments.

Percentage


If you have X% of the eligible voters you will have X% of the seats. Modified to guaranty that every region has one seat.

Votes are the number of eligible voters in the last election expressed in the thousands.

Seats are the number of seats to 2 decimal places.

Drop is dropping the decimal remainder leaving you with 296 seats.

Adjust is the adjustment of adding 4 seats to bring the total to 300. The 3 Territories each get 1 since every province or territory is guarantied at least 1 seat. The remaining 1 seat adjustment goes to New Brunswick since it is the one with the highest decimal remainder.

Final is the seat count after the adjustment.

Percentages


If you took the percentage each Party got in every province and added it up, divided by 10, what would you get? The average provincial popular vote and how would this compare to the national popular vote? Take a look and I was very surprised by the result.

Non voting members

All Leaders of Official Parties should be given a non-voting seat in the House of Commons. Check the post below and Canada has 5 Official Parties; Liberal, Conservative, NDP, Bloc, and the Green Party. Poilievre will not have to ask someone to step aside and trigger an unnecessary by-election and the new Leader of the NDP, when elected, will get to be in the House should they not be an MP.

Non-voting members do not vote, do not sit on any subsidiary body of the Commons, but can motion and speak in the House. US House of Representative’s non-voting members do sit on and vote in committee. These Territorial delegates do not vote on the House floor.

Dual Electoral System

42nd Federal election results

Party

Liberal

Cons

NDP

Bloc

Green

Ind

Seats

184

99

44

10

1

0

Dual

301

223

128

21

2

1

House votes

54%

29%

13%

3%

0.3%

0%

Dual votes

51%

29%

18%

3%

0.5%

0.1%

With Liberal/Cons members elected the NDP & Bloc & Green go to the Liberals

Liberal/NDP members elected the Bloc & Green to NDP , Cons 2/3 to Liberals

Cons/NDP members elected the Liberal & Bloc & Green to the NDP

Liberal/Bloc members elected the NDP & Green & Cons 1/2 to each

NDP/Bloc members elected the Liberal & Green to NDP , Cons 1/2 to each

Dual Electoral System

A preference ballot is used for voting. The candidate with the number one on a ballot gets one vote. The two candidates with the most votes are elected. The ballots are counted a second time with the elected candidate with the lower number getting one vote. Each elected member will have one ” member vote ” in the House to be used in regular sessions and one ” legislative vote ” for each vote received on the second count of the ballots. These votes are voted when the House is in legislative session and is used to pass, what else, legislation! One day a week is set by the Commons for the legislative session and any bills requiring third reading are voted on during that session.

The main drawback of this system is if you keep the same number of ridings you will double the number of members or having the same number of members will double the size of the electoral ridings.

Benefits of the Dual Electoral System

  1. Guarantee of an opposition since no party can have more than 50% of the members.
  2. In regular sessions the members have one vote each so there will be non-partisan voting on the election of the Speaker, rules of the House (2/3 majority), procedural motions and committee membership.
  3. In legislative session you will have proportional representation since each member will have one vote for each vote received on the second count of the ballots.
  4. No party lists since your still voting for the Member of Parliament of your choice. One MP represents the majority vote in a riding and the other MP the main minority vote.
  5. No major revision of the electoral map. Ridings should only be altered when the number of electors in a riding is 50% or less of the number of electors in the largest riding. Each election few if any ridings will change. This will mitigate the political fighting over riding boundaries or size for the purpose of any real or imagined partisan gain.
  6. An incentive to vote since the more votes an MP gets the more votes they have on voting on legislation. Also ridings will increase their voting strength in the House if their voting turn out is higher than the average.
  7. All votes do count! If your first choice doesn’t get elected then one of the two candidates who did get elected will get to vote your vote because of the preference ballot.

If the dual electoral system were to be used it would have to be decided what the maximum size of the House of Commons should be. A House of Commons of 300 members would give you 150 ridings electing 2 members each. This results in an 11% reduction in the size of the Commons and a 125% increase in the size of the ridings. The Party standings in such a House would roughly be 134 Liberals, 99 Conservatives, 57 NDP, 9 Bloc, and 1 Green.

You can try it before you buy it by forming the House advisory council. This council to consist of the top two candidates for each riding. This giving a council of 676 members all having one vote in regular session. All the other candidates in each riding transfers their popular votes to one of the council members from their riding. This added to their own gives the number of votes they have in the council in legislative session. The Council in regular session advises the Commons on procedural votes and in legislative session advises the House on the passage of legislation.