Tag Archives: justin trudeau

Lost in the crowd

84 candidates in the last by-election, this is a bigger joke then Justin Trudeau. Hello! Liberals, past time to ditch this dude. Here’s how to get the candidates for an election in a 3 month process.

First month, by the 15th any person on the voter’s list for the riding can pay the registration fee and declare that they’re a candidate or nominate someone who is also on the riding’s voter’s list. Also by the 15th the top 2 candidates in the last election can declare they are running again and are automatically on the ballot. This incumbency is vested in the people and not the Party. By the end of the month those who got nominated must accept being a candidate.

The first endorsement period lasts till the end of the second month where anyone on the voter’s list may publicly endorse one of the candidates including any incumbent. If there is no incumbent running the top 8 most endorsed go to the second endorsement period that lasts till the end of the third month. If one incumbent is running then the top 7 most endorsed go on and if both incumbents are on the ballot the top 6 endorsed non-incumbents go to the second endorsement period.

The second endorsement period lasts till the end of the third month. No incumbents running it’s the top 6 endorsed candidates who get on the ballot. One incumbent it’s the top 5 non incumbent candidates and both incumbents running the top 4 non incumbent candidates make it to the ballot.

The 6-5-4 rule is you want choice without fragmentation. Not too many candidates and not too few. 6 candidates where you want a popular choice, 4 candidates where you want to know the candidates better for an important office, and 5 candidates for a mid-range choice.

Same old Same old

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/incumbent-liberals-who-meet-new-conditions-wont-have-to-face-nomination-challenge/article37761517/

The same old and same old story repeating again. “Some are better, some are worse, but in the end, they are all the same.” In the Federalist Party it is done differently. All Party members in good standing can run for the nomination if they can be a candidate for the House of Commons. However there is section 4.7 of the constitution that states.

4.7 The Congress in regular session by an absolute three-quarters majority vote can bar a party member from being a candidate for the Federalist nomination for the House of Commons. The Congress by an absolute two-thirds majority vote can rescind the Candidacy of a member after they have won the nomination election. This is to be done within 90 days of the nomination.

There are no protected nominations, they are all open, and you want it, then earn it. There is no secretive committee deciding behind closed doors whether you can run or not.

11.3 The Leader shall sign all nomination and Election Canada papers. Any refusal shall mean the automatic and immediate expulsion from the Party.

Clearly removes the potential for abuse by a Party leader. 

Who pays your salary?

images-duckduckgo-comWho pays your salary Mr. Trudeau? It’s that person asking the question. If a citizen and taxpayer ask you a question in a language you speak you answer them back in that language. I know you don’t need the money but that’s not the point. You are an employee and you’re attitude and actions doesn’t reflect an understanding of this. Your response to this becoming an issue was insulting. Big surprise, there’s a significant English population in the Townships. I thought you knew Quebec!

Hypocrisy

Canada's PM Trudeau speaks during a news conference in Ottawa

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/citizenship-revocation-trudeau-harper-1.3795733

As I said before “Some are better, some are worse, but in the end, they are all the same” The best ones admit that they are doing a 180º from what they said in the election and explain why they are doing so. What Mr.Trudeau is doing is the usual spin we get after the election for campaign promises are used to get what you want and forgotten about afterwards. Same Old, same old. The part that bothers me the most about this is that you can be deprived of your citizenship without any hearing. Something to do with a quaint old-fashioned notion of “Your innocent until proven guilty”.

 

Same old, same old

TE“Some are better, and some are worst, but in the end they are all the same.”

 

A question I haven’t heard in the comments on Mr. Trudeau’s action is Why was he out of his chair in the first place? The complete and total hypocrisy of any comments from any member of the Conservative party is lost on them.

Just like what I recommend for dealing with confirmation of appointments should be done for legislation. There is a set period of time for debate. The Commons by super majorities can shorten that debate and by minorities lengthen that debate. Something like this.

  • Automatic vote on a bill 180 days after introduction, unless the following
  • By a vote of 90% of the full House (303) bill is voted on 30 days after introduction
  • By a vote of 75% of the full House (252) 60 days
  • By a vote of 67% of the full House (224) 90 days
  • By a vote of 60% of the full House (202) 120 days
  • By a vote of 50% of the full House (168) 360 days
  • By a vote of 33% of the full House (112) 270 days
  • By a vote of 25% of the full House (84) 240 days
  • By a vote of 10% of the full House (34) 210 days

The Liberals by themselves don’t have the votes to bring a bill to a vote faster then the set 180 days. The opposition combined could set a bill vote back to 9 months after being introduced. The conservatives alone could lengthen the debate to 8 months and the NDP by itself to 7 months. If the Liberals got the agreement of the NDP they could pass a bill 90 days after it being introduced and with the Conservatives 60 days after introduction.

The majority can’t ram through and the minority can’t block.

“The power of democracy is vested in the majority and in the minority it’s principle.” Barry Aulis