Tag Archives: Government reform

Mr. Real Change

g3403

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/government-ads-liberals-1.3455529

As always with the change of government the new one promptly starts behaving like the previous government they criticized while in opposition. As with all these Political Monarchs (PM / Premier) “Some are better, some are worse, but in the end, they are all the same.”

There is to be created the Council of State which consists of the Council of Ministers and the Council of Opposition. This would include only those who hold the senior portfolios of the ministers of the crown as defined in an Act of Parliament and not the whim of the PM (Political Monarch) of the day. Equal number of members from both the government and the opposition of the day and presided over by the Governor-General. It would be this body that sets the rules governing the communications policy of the government of Canada and it’s departments and agencies. This requires a 2/3 majority vote of the council if introduced by the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition. If introduced be just one of them then it requires a three-quarter majority vote.

Also as a direct subsidiary body you would have the Federal Government Communication Office (FGCO) charged with overseeing the implementation of federal communication policy. Chairman would be the Minister of state responsible for the FGCO and deputy chairman the opposite number in the Opposition. Also included are the minister of public service, the minister of heritage, and their opposite numbers in the Council of Opposition. At the start of each Parliament the Council of Ministers and the Council of Opposition each appoints a member of the FGCO who would serve for the duration of 3 Parliaments. Half the membership comes from the government and half from the opposition. Half are from the cabinet and the opposition council and half are appointed members with long terms of office.

The FGCO would currently have 6 Conservatives, 5 Liberals, and 1 NDP. This would include 3 Liberal ministers, 3 Conservatives in the opposition council, 3 conservative members, 2 liberal members, and 1 NDP member. The approval of the FGCO would be required for any advertising by the government of Canada and this needs the vote of 8 of the 12. Control of the Government of Canada’s website would be under the jurisdiction of the FGCO. Non partisan and not run out of the PMO and doesn’t stand a chance of happening. Some variation of the same old is all we can expect.

US Judicial Appointments

scaliaAs I have posted before, a different way then how senate confirmation of presidential appointments are currently done. This idea occurred to me after the nomination of Judge Bork by President Reagan. The Senate has every right to confirm, every right to reject, but no right to not vote in a timely matter. What the Democrats did then and what the Republicans in an even worse way intend to do now is wrong! For good reasons, bad reasons, or no reason the Senate is to confirm or reject every appointment made by any President of the United States.

This should be the process. After President Obama nominates someone to fill the vacancy on the Supreme court created by the death of Justice Scalia the Senate holds a vote to determine when the Senate holds a confirmation vote. There are 5 set days, 20 days after the appointment, 30 days, 40 days, 60 days, or the first sitting of the Senate 80 days after the appointment. The default is the middle setting of 40 days or some 8 weeks after the appointment the Senate will vote to confirm or reject the nominee. By super majorities the Senate can advance the vote to 30 days after nomination with the vote of 67 Senators or only 20 days after appointment by a vote of 75 Senators. By minorities the Senate can delay the vote to 60 days after nomination with the vote of 33 Senators or till 80 days after appointment by a vote of 50 Senators.

All confirmation votes of Presidential judicial appointments will occur on the first sitting of the Senate that’s 20 / 30 / 40 / 60 / 80 days after the President nominates someone to fill a vacancy in the federal judiciary. The minority can delay a vote but not block it and super majorities can advance that vote but not ram it through. Each appointment gets confirmed or rejected no early then 4 weeks to no longer then 16 weeks after the nomination by the President. One change I’d make would be for judicial appointments to require a 2/3 majority for confirmation. For the federal bench a 2/3 majority of the Senate present and voting and for the Supreme court an absolute 2/3 majority or at least 67 votes to confirm.

House of Commons committees

commonsfloor“Real Change” does it again.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/house-commons-standing-committees-list-1.3425906

Here’s the letter I just mailed (Yes, Canada post kind) to my Liberal MP and see what Mrs. Marie-Claude Bibeau is going to be worth.

Dear Mrs Bibeau:

I was truly shocked to read a news article on how the Commons committees were going to be done. What you are supporting is fundamentally wrong. I propose a different way of doing the committees of the House of Commons then what “Real Change” is doing now.

24 committees with 16 seats on each for 384 committee assignments

Party

House

Committee seats

Final seats

Fixed

Assigned

Liberal

184

209.04

209

8 (192)

17

Conservative

99

112.47 (+1)

113

4 (96)

17

NDP

44

49.99 (+1)

50

2 (48)

2

Bloc

10

11.36

11

0 (0)

11

Green

1

1.14

1

0 (0)

1

Independents

0

0.00

0

0 (0)

0

Total

338

382

384

14 (336)

48

There are a total of 384 seats on the 24 committees and they are to be distributed to the Parties in direct proportion to their seats in the House of Commons. Independents are treated as another Party in the House. A Party’s House seats is divided by the full House and multiplied by the number of committee assignments (384). The remainder is dropped and any extra seats to get to 384 are awarded to the party with the highest decimal remainder. A Party’s fixed number of seats on a committee is the minimum they will have on all committees and within parentheses the total number of seats. Assigned is the number of seats their House Leader chooses to bring their number of seats up to their seat total. There are 2 unassigned seats on each committee to be assigned by the Parties for a total of the last 48 committee seats.

The unassigned seats are chosen by the Party’s House Leaders in order of their Party’s standing in the House with one seat chosen by each in each round. First round goes the Liberal House leader, Conservative, NDP, Bloc, and the Green. If there were any Independents the most senior member would get to choose a committee assignment. The second round would be the Liberals chose one, Conservative, NDP, and Bloc. For the 3rd to 11th rounds there would only be the Liberal, Conservative, and Bloc. The Liberals and Conservatives choose the twelve last committee assignments in rounds 12 to 17. Each Party can choose only 1 unassigned seat on each committee.

The process to determine committee assignments for the members is done similar to the choosing of the unassigned committee seats. The Parties, round by round, choose committee seats in order of their standing in the House. At least half of the Party’s seats on each committee are chosen by the members themselves in order of their seniority in caucus. The House Leader or Deputy House leader assigns the remainder. These positions are to be elected directly by the members of that Party’s caucus by secret ballot in the House of Commons chamber. The winner by majority vote becomes that Party’s House Leader and the runner up the Deputy House leader. The Leader assigns the majority of the remainder and the Deputy leader the rest. If it’s 2 seats then it’s 1 seat assigned by each.

Party

Committee seats

Members choice

Leader assigns

Deputy assigns

Liberal

9

5

3

1

Liberal

8

4

3

1

Conservative

5

3

1

1

Conservative

4

2

1

1

NDP

3

2

1

0

NDP

2

1

1

0

Bloc / Green

1

1

0

0

In the first round of choosing committee assignments the most senior Liberal member chooses a committee to sit on. Then the most senior members of the Conservatives, NDP, and the Bloc Parties choose a committee seat. The Green party has only one committee assignment so that goes to its only MP. This process repeats with the next most senior members choosing a committee to sit on until all the committee assignments that are chosen by the choice of the members are filled. After that when a Party’s turn is up in a round it’s that Party’s House Leader the assigns a seat to a member. The next time after that the Deputy leader assigns one then back to the Leader the time after that. This continues until all the 384 committee seats on the 24 committees are filled.

This idea has it’s basis on what I thought about the situation in the 1980s for the US House of Representatives where the Democrats had a higher percentage of seats on the House committees then they had in the full chamber. Again fundamentally wrong and every member of a legislative body should get to serve on at least 1 of its committees.

Sincerely yours,

Senate letter

The letter I’ve sent to all the Liberal senators over the last 2 months usually 1 a day.

I just noticed that His Excellency, Governor General David Johnson was appointed in October of 2010. Here is a different method for the appointment of the Governor General of Canada that removes the Political Monarch (PM) from the process and makes the office independent of the PM of the day. I believe the slogan is “Real Change”. This process can also be applied to the Senate of Canada.

There shall be a Council to aid and advise in the Government of Canada, to be styled the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada; and the Persons who are to be Members of that Council shall be from Time to Time chosen and summoned by the Governor General and sworn in as Privy Councillors, and Members thereof may be from Time to Time removed by the Governor General.”

Constitutional Act, 1867 Section 3 Article 11

The Privy Council would have members who are appointed or ex-officio. The ex-officio members are appointed to the Privy Council when they are appointed to the office that gives membership in the Privy Council. They are removed from the Privy Council when they no longer hold that office. These would be the members of the Council of Ministers and the Council of Opposition. An act of Parliament, not order-in-council, would set the ministers of the crown. The ministers or opposition councillors that hold these portfolios are always in the cabinet or opposition council and can never hold more then one at a time. Ministers of state can be in cabinet or their opposites in the Council of Opposition, but this is not automatic. Thus in the government of Canada the senior portfolios are held by the ministers of the crown and the junior by the ministers of state.

There will be a maximum of 216 appointed members who serve for life. By custom and precedence those who are the following are appointed Privy Councillors for Canada, Speaker of the House, Speaker of the Senate, Justices of the Supreme court, Prime minister and Leader of the opposition, Governor General, and Lieutenant Governors of the provinces. When there is a vacancy the following can nominate a person for appointment. The Governor General can nominate people for appointment. The Lieutenant Governors can nominate some one from their province. Three Privy councillors can nominate a person. The top two candidates from a riding can nominate some one from their province or territory. The nominees are put to a confirming vote of the House Advisory Council. This body consists of the top two candidates in each riding, which gives a council of 676 members, 301 Liberals (45%), 223 Conservatives (33%), 128 NDP (19%), 21 Bloc (3%), 2 Green, and 1 Independent. To be confirmed takes a 2/3 majority by a secret ballot. Every nominee gets voted on yes or no. If more then one gets confirmed then it’s the one with the most votes that gets appointed.

Distribution of the Privy Councillors is shown in the table. Each province gets 9 councillors with the 3 northern territories getting the same for 3 councillors each. The natives not in the territories counts as a province so get 9 as well. This gives a total of 108. A further 108 seats is distributed among the above on the basis of eligible voters in the last General election. Half the Privy Council is by population and the other half by equal representation.

Province / Territory

% of voters

Population

Equal

# of Councillors

British Columbia

12.38%

13

9

22

Alberta

10.35%

11

9

20

Saskatchewan

2.83%

3

9

12

Manitoba

3.23%

4

9

13

Ontario

35.42%

38

9

47

Quebec

23.62%

26

9

35

New Brunswick

2.20%

2

9

11

Nova Scotia

2.72%

3

9

12

PEI

0.42%

1

9

10

Newfoundland

1.55%

2

9

11

Yukon

0.10%

0

3

3

NWT

0.11%

0

3

3

Nunavut

0.07%

0

3

3

Natives

~5.00%

5

9

14

Total

108

108

216

It is the appointed members who advise the Queen on the selection of a person for the position of Governor General of Canada. The Privy Council is assembled with Queen in Council and it takes 3 privy councillors to nominate some one as Governor General. All nominated individuals who are councillors are asked to leave and the council debates on which one to appoint. After the debate any nominated members are asked back in and the Privy Council votes yes or no for each one by secret ballot. On the first ballot it takes 75% to get recommended for appointment. If there is more then one then Her Majesty can appoint any one of the nominees. If no one gets the required 75% then there is a second ballot where it takes a 2/3 majority to get recommended for appointment. A third ballot requires only a 60% vote. A fourth and final ballot requires a simple majority. If still no nominee with a recommend ballot then the process is started over with no past nominee on the ballot. Once the Queen appoints a person as Governor General it must be confirmed by the House Advisory Council. Confirmation takes an absolute 2/3 majority (451) by secret ballot.

The Governor General serves for a 12-year term. By a 2/3 majority vote the Privy Council can recommend extending the term of office by 6 years. By a 75% vote can recommend a second and last extension, also of 6 years. The House Advisory Council must confirm these extensions by secret ballot by an absolute 75% vote (507). The Privy Council can recommend the removal of the Governor General by an absolute 2/3 majority vote of the current members.

Reform of Senate membership (same process as the Privy council)

Province / Territory

% of voters

Population

Equal

# of Senators

British Columbia

13.03%

4

3

7 (6)*

Alberta

10.89%

4

3

7 (6)*

Saskatchewan

2.98%

1

3

4

Manitoba

3.41%

1

3

4

Ontario

37.29%

12

3

15

Quebec

24.86%

8

3

11

New Brunswick

2.31%

1

3

4

Nova Scotia

2.87%

1

3

4

PEI

0.44%

0

3

3

Newfoundland

1.62%

1

3

4

Yukon

0.10%

0

1

1

NWT

0.11%

0

1

1

Nunavut

0.07%

0

1

1

Total

33

33

66 (64)*

*BC & Alberta limited to a maximum of 6 seats

A reform of the Senate membership changed to 66 senators. When a seat goes vacant the top two candidates in a riding in that province or territory nominate someone for appointment. All the nominees go to a yes or no secret ballot vote of the House Advisory Council. It takes an absolute 2/3 majority (451) to get confirmed. If more then one gets the required vote then the one with the most is appointed. Membership is for 25 years after which a senator becomes a senator emeritus. These senators can attend and speak in chamber but can’t sit on any subsidiary body and have no vote. When a senator retires to this position their seat as a voting senator is vacated. To start the membership all current senators stay as long as it doesn’t exceed the number of senators for that province or territory. Any in excess then the most junior senators voluntary resign their seats. Also any who have been there 25 years become a senator emeritus. The voting senators become emeritus when they hit the 25-year mark.

The Senate of Canada is solely a chamber of sober second thought. It is non-partisan and appointment is through a process independent from the Political Monarch of the day. All appointees can’t be members of political parties or association. They cannot donate to such organizations or attend any of their meetings. The House of Commons establishes a legislative session where any bills to be passed is voted on each week. This is to be Wednesday at 1 PM. The Senate’s legislative session would be Thursday at 1 PM where any bill that passed the House on Wednesday is voted on. If passed it goes to the Governor General on Friday for royal assent.

The Senate by a majority vote may send a bill back to the House with or without recommendations. The next week in the Commons the bill can be withdrawn, voted on, or tabled for revision. If the sponsor withdraws the bill, it kills it. The sponsor can have the bill voted on “as is” for a second time on Wednesday’s legislative session. The bill can be tabled for revision in which case the sponsor has 90 days to introduce a revised bill or the bill is deemed withdrawn from consideration by the House. The second time the Senate gets a bill by a 2/3 majority can send it back to the House with objections. If the bill passes the Commons for the third time the Senate passes the bill and sends it to the Governor General. Thus the Senate at most can delay any bill by 2 weeks.

As long as the Senate is partisan-appointed and partisan in operation it cannot be a sober chamber of second thought. As long as it is not elected it has no right to block legislation passed by the House of Commons. A New Year and maybe Senate reform for 2016.

senate Sincerely yours,

Custom and Precedence

commonsfloor At the start of each Parliament the Speaker after the members of the House of Commons are sworn in asks “who should the Governor-General call upon to form a government”? The four most endorsed candidates are invited to Rideau Hall and asked to form a council-designate, a government-in-waiting. After each leader who accepts forms a proposed government of say 16 to 20 members the Speaker puts the question to the House “which of these councils-designate has the confidence of this House”? The two with the least are dropped from the second ballot. The Commons votes a second time with the winner becoming the Council of Ministers and the loser the Council of Opposition. No vote in the House triggers an election only an absolute 2/3 majority (226 out of 338) passing a motion of dissolution can trigger an election before the set election day. No vote can replace the current government with another. The Council of Ministers is the government for the duration of that Parliament. Any individual minister can be dismissed by a 60% vote of the House. If it’s the Prime Minister then an absolute 60% majority (203).